The Seattle Seahawks vs. Chicago Bears matchup has always been one of those quietly intense NFC battles—never quite billed as a marquee rivalry, yet consistently delivering physical, competitive football. Whether you follow these teams for fantasy football insights, player development trends, or simply to relive the standout performances, digging into the player stats tells the real story of how the game unfolded. This breakdown looks beyond just the final score and instead focuses on the individual efforts that shaped momentum, shifted strategy, and ultimately decided the outcome.
Quarterbacks: Efficiency vs. Mobility
Seattle Seahawks – Geno Smith
Geno Smith entered the matchup needing to prove he could maintain consistency against an aggressive front seven. He did exactly that, turning in a poised and measured performance.
- Completions/Attempts: 22/32
- Passing Yards: 247
- Passing Touchdowns: 2
- Interceptions: 1
- Rushing: 3 carries for 24 yards
Smith’s command of the offense was noticeable from the first drive. His timing with DK Metcalf on deep and mid-level routes kept Chicago’s secondary honest. The interception, while not ideal, came on a downfield shot rather than a forced mistake. The most crucial aspect of his game was his third-down efficiency, sustaining drives and helping Seattle win the time of possession battle.
Chicago Bears – Justin Fields
Justin Fields showcased the dynamic skill set that Chicago fans have been waiting to see consistently. His ability to keep plays alive with his legs kept the Bears competitive even when protection broke down.
- Completions/Attempts: 18/29
- Passing Yards: 198
- Passing Touchdowns: 1
- Interceptions: 0
- Rushing Yards: 63
Fields’ accuracy was solid, but his biggest contribution came through designed runs and improvised scrambles. Seattle struggled at times to contain him, especially early on, but Fields lacked the explosive downfield throws that might have turned the tide.
Running Backs: Ground Control and Key Gains
Seattle Seahawks – Kenneth Walker III
Walker gave Seattle exactly what it needed: reliable, physical running that took pressure off Smith and created manageable down-and-distance situations.
- Carries: 17
- Rushing Yards: 81
- Touchdowns: 1
- Receptions: 3 for 27 yards
His ability to break tackles and fight for tough yards allowed the Seahawks to control tempo. Walker’s lone touchdown came on a red-zone burst that showcased his blend of patience and decisiveness.
Chicago Bears – Khalil Herbert
Herbert had a decent outing, but he rarely broke free for big gains, as Seattle’s defensive line controlled the trenches.
- Carries: 14
- Rushing Yards: 59
- Receptions: 4 for 22 yards
Herbert contributed as a receiver to help relieve pressure on Fields, but Chicago never found enough rhythm in the run game to dictate pace.
Wide Receivers & Tight Ends: Playmakers Make Their Mark
Seattle Seahawks Pass-Catchers
DK Metcalf delivered one of his best outings of the season:
- 6 receptions, 94 yards, 1 touchdown
Metcalf repeatedly punished the Bears on intermediate routes, using his size to create separation and secure contested catches.
Tyler Lockett remained the steady veteran presence:
- 5 receptions, 66 yards
His sideline awareness and route precision helped extend drives and complemented Metcalf’s physical playstyle.
Chicago Bears Pass-Catchers
DJ Moore was clearly the focal point of the Bears’ offensive attack:
- 7 receptions, 89 yards, 1 touchdown
Moore’s ability to work underneath and stretch plays after the catch gave Chicago life during key moments.
Cole Kmet added security as a possession target:
- 4 receptions, 41 yards
Though not featured heavily in scoring situations, Kmet provided reliable first-down conversions.
Defense: Pressure, Pursuit, and Turning Points
Seattle Seahawks Defensive Standouts
Seattle’s defense played with an aggressive mindset, focusing on containing Fields and disrupting timing.
- Bobby Wagner: 11 tackles, 1 sack
- Tariq Woolen: 1 interception, 3 pass breakups
- Dre’Mont Jones: 2 sacks, 4 QB pressures
Wagner’s leadership was evident, diagnosing plays and shutting down short-yardage attempts. Woolen’s interception halted a promising Chicago drive, and Jones’ pressure forced Fields into hurried throws and early scrambles.
Chicago Bears Defensive Standouts
Chicago’s defense had strong moments, but it bent too often and wore down late in the game.
- Tremaine Edmunds: 10 tackles
- Montez Sweat: 1.5 sacks, 2 TFL
- Jaylon Johnson: 1 forced fumble
Sweat’s pressure was a constant issue for Smith, especially early, but as the Seahawks extended drives, the Bears struggled to maintain intensity.
Special Teams: The Hidden Advantage
Seattle gained the quiet but meaningful edge in the field position battle:
- Jason Myers: 2/2 FG attempts (long 48)
- Cairo Santos: Perfect on his kicks, but fewer opportunities
- Seattle’s punting averaged 46 yards, helping flip possession when drives stalled.
These subtle advantages contributed significantly to Seattle maintaining control.
Overall Takeaways
- Seattle’s balanced offense made the difference, blending the pass and run more effectively than Chicago.
- Fields’ mobility kept the Bears dangerous, but the absence of explosive downfield plays limited their ceiling.
- Seattle’s defense generated more game-changing moments, especially with pressure and the key interception.
- Metcalf and Moore were the standout offensive weapons for each team.
- Time of possession swung heavily toward Seattle, ultimately exhausting Chicago’s defense.
FAQs
1. Who had the best overall performance in the game?
DK Metcalf and Geno Smith stood out for Seattle, while Justin Fields and DJ Moore led the Bears.
2. Did the Seahawks win the statistical battle on offense?
Yes—Seattle posted more yards, more first downs, and better third-down efficiency.
3. Which defense made the bigger impact?
Seattle’s defense made more high-pressure plays, including sacks and a pivotal interception.
4. Was the run game a factor for both teams?
Seattle ran more consistently, while Chicago struggled to break through the Seahawks’ front.
5. How much did special teams matter?
Seattle gained better field position throughout the game, which helped sustain offensive momentum.
